Lawrence Diggs v. Baltimore County Public School

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00715-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999851498] Mailed to: Lawrence Diggs. [15-2298]

Appeal: 15-2298

Doc: 17

Filed: 06/13/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2298

LAWRENCE DIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
BALTIMORE COUNTY; KEVIN KAMENETZ,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00715-RDB)

Submitted:

May 19, 2016

Decided:

June 13, 2016

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Andrew G.
Scott, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2298

Doc: 17

Filed: 06/13/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Diggs appeals the district court’s order granting
Baltimore County Public Schools’ motion for summary judgment and
closing

his

civil

action

that

raised

claims

of

employment

discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2012).
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.
of

Baltimore

2015).
legal
before

Cty.,

No.

See Diggs v. Bd. of Educ.

1:14-cv-00715-RDB

(D.

Md.

Sept.

23,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2