Kathleen Scavello v. Commissioner of SSA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00390-TLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999912797]. [15-2300]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2300 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/18/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2300 KATHLEEN THERESA SCAVELLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00390-TLW) Submitted: August 12, 2016 Decided: August 18, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida, for Appellant. Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Charles Kawas, Acting Supervisory Attorney, Jillian Quick, Assistant Regional Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Marshall Prince, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2300 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/18/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kathleen Theresa Scavello appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. the We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scavello v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 5:14-cv-00390-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?