In re: Jerry Wayne Sharpe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999709057-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999686021-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999694677-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03269-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999722207]. Mailed to: Jerry Sharpe. [15-2303]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2303 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2303 In re: JERRY WAYNE SHARPE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:14-ct-03269-F) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Sharpe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2303 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for release pending appeal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. present record court. and petition. before not reveal undue delay in the district Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis deny legal does We find the the mandamus petition and the amended mandamus We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. PETITIONS DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?