In re: Jerry Wayne Sharpe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999709057-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999686021-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999694677-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03269-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999722207]. Mailed to: Jerry Sharpe. [15-2303]
Appeal: 15-2303
Doc: 7
Filed: 12/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2303
In re:
JERRY WAYNE SHARPE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:14-ct-03269-F)
Submitted:
December 17, 2015
Decided:
December 21, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Wayne Sharpe, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2303
Doc: 7
Filed: 12/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry
Wayne
Sharpe
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his motion for release pending appeal.
He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act.
present
record
court.
and
petition.
before
not
reveal
undue
delay
in
the
district
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
deny
legal
does
We find the
the
mandamus
petition
and
the
amended
mandamus
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
PETITIONS DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?