Hieda Keeler v. City of Hampton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00076-AWA-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999737331]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-2306]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2306 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2306 HIEDA KEELER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF HAMPTON; VICE MAYOR LINDA CURTIS; DEBRA MOSS, Hampton City Attorney; UNKNOWN UNIFORMED HAMPTON OFFICER; KAREN RODRIGUEZ, VA DCJS; UNKNOWN STATE TROOPER, LICENSE 8675US; BELINDA ROBINSON; SHORTY WALLIN LOCK SHOP; TWEEDS LOCK SHOP; FBI AGENT KEVIN ROJEK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:15-cv-00076-AWA-RJK) Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016 Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Brandi Allison Law, Senior Assistant City Attorney, Lola Rodriguez Perkins, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Hampton, Virginia; Michael R. Spitzer, II, MIDKIFF, MUNCIE & ROSS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2306 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Hieda Keeler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reasons reversible stated by error. the district we court. affirm Keeler v. for City Hampton, No. 4:15-cv-00076-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2015). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts the of We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?