Connecticut General Life Ins v. Edward Feldman

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03670-WMN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999814582]. Mailed to: E. Feldman. [15-2311]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2311 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/06/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2311 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, and PENN MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., Defendant - Appellee, v. EDWARD S. FELDMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-03670-WMN) Submitted: April 29, 2016 Decided: May 6, 2016 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward S. Feldman, Appellant Pro Se. Brian A. Coleman, DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH, LLP, Washington, D.C., Stephen R. Harris, DRINKER, BIDDLE & REATH, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Jerrold A. Thrope, GORDON FEINBLATT LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Appeal: 15-2311 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/06/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-2311 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/06/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Edward S. Feldman appeals the district court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings to Penn Mortgage Company, Inc., in interpleader Connecticut action General and Life dismissing Insurance his cross-claims for failure to state a claim. record and find no reversible error. Company’s counterclaims and We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Feldman, No. 1:14-cv-03670-WMN (D. Md. July 1, 2015). We dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?