Connecticut General Life Ins v. Edward Feldman
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03670-WMN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999814582]. Mailed to: E. Feldman. [15-2311]
Appeal: 15-2311
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/06/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2311
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
PENN MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
EDWARD S. FELDMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-03670-WMN)
Submitted:
April 29, 2016
Decided:
May 6, 2016
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward S. Feldman, Appellant Pro Se. Brian A. Coleman, DRINKER
BIDDLE & REATH, LLP, Washington, D.C., Stephen R. Harris,
DRINKER, BIDDLE & REATH, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Jerrold A.
Thrope,
GORDON
FEINBLATT
LLC,
Baltimore,
Maryland,
for
Appellees.
Appeal: 15-2311
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/06/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2311
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/06/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Edward
S.
Feldman
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting judgment on the pleadings to Penn Mortgage Company,
Inc.,
in
interpleader
Connecticut
action
General
and
Life
dismissing
Insurance
his
cross-claims for failure to state a claim.
record and find no reversible error.
Company’s
counterclaims
and
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Conn. Gen. Life Ins.
Co. v. Feldman, No. 1:14-cv-03670-WMN (D. Md. July 1, 2015).
We dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?