Nora Gutierrez v. East Beach-Bay Marine Marina
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00476-RAJ-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999799961]. Mailed to: Nora Gutierrez. [15-2326]
Appeal: 15-2326
Doc: 28
Filed: 04/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2326
NORA SOTO GUTIERREZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EAST BEACH-BAY MARINE MARINA, INC.; BLANDINE ESPEJO, in
capacity as manager; STEPHEN J. GREGORY, in capacity as
manager; VININGS MARINE, INC.; BRIAN PARKER, in capacity as
manager; CUTTY SARK MARINA, CO-OWNER/COOK JANE DOE; THE CITY
OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA; OFFICER CROWDER, In capacity of Chief
of Investigations - Norfolk Police Dept.; CAPTAIN A. M.
POMERANZ, Norfolk Police Dept.; CINDY HALL, In capacity of
Asst. City Atty.; W. G. SNYDER, In Capacity of Police
Officer; OFFICER LOGAN, Norfolk Police Department; VA DEPT.
OF GAME & INLAND FISHERIES; DORITA ADAMS, as head of boat
titling dept.; JOHN EVANS, as boat titling agent; CINDY
MORGAN, as boat titling agent; ESPEJO, friend or associate;
JANE DOE; U.S. POSTAL WORKER JOHN DOE; G. C. WALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00476-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted:
April 19, 2016
Decided:
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
April 21, 2016
Appeal: 15-2326
Doc: 28
Filed: 04/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Nora Soto Gutierrez, Appellant Pro Se.
Jonathan Duncan
Pitchford, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia; Marissa Marriott Henderson, VENTKER WARMAN HENDERSON,
PLLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Douglas Fredericks, Virginia Beach,
Virginia; Heather Ann Mullen, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2326
Doc: 28
Filed: 04/21/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Nora
Soto
Gutierrez
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing her civil action and denying her motion for leave to
file a third amended complaint.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
Marine
Marina,
2015).
legal
before
No.
we
affirm
for
the
Gutierrez v. E. Beach-Bay
2:14-cv-00476-RAJ-LRL
(E.D.
Va.
Sept.
23,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?