Sandeep Singh v. Loretta Lynch
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-940-835. Copies to all parties and the agency. . Mailed to: Petitioner. [15-2337]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
March 17, 2016
April 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandeep Singh, Petitioner Pro Se. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Assistant
Director, Jessica Dawgert, Ilissa Michelle Gould, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Sandeep Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his
Singh’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence.
that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any
§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the
See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board.
See In re: Singh (B.I.A. Oct. 1, 2015).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Singh does not challenge the denial of relief under the
Convention Against Torture. Accordingly, review of that issue is
waived. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?