In re: Curtis Sangster

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999698846-2]; terminating Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999704123-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999691905-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02114-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999763969]. Mailed to: Sangster. [15-2351]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2351 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2351 In re: CURTIS LOUIS SANGSTER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:15-hc-02114-D) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Louis Sangster, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2351 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Louis Sangster petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. record does not reveal undue delay in We find the present the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?