In re: Curtis Sangster
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999698846-2]; terminating Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999704123-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999691905-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02114-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999763969]. Mailed to: Sangster. [15-2351]
Appeal: 15-2351
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2351
In re:
CURTIS LOUIS SANGSTER,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:15-hc-02114-D)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Decided:
February 29, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Louis Sangster, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2351
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Louis Sangster petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 (2012) petition.
He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
record
does
not
reveal
undue
delay
in
We find the present
the
district
court.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny
the mandamus petition.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?