Charlotte Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999806789]. Mailed to: Charlotte Mountcastle. [15-2381]
Appeal: 15-2381
Doc: 9
Filed: 04/28/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2381
CHARLOTTE D. MOUNTCASTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PREMIER AUTO BROKERS INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK)
Submitted:
April 5, 2016
Decided:
April 28, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlotte D. Mountcastle, Appellant Pro Se.
David Denman
Hopper, COOK, HEYWARD, LEE, HOPPER & FEEHAN, PC, Glen Allen,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2381
Doc: 9
Filed: 04/28/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court’s order
dismissing
her
amended
jurisdiction.
We
reversible error.
complaint
have
reviewed
for
lack
the
of
record
subject
and
matter
find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers
Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2015).
dispense
with
contentions
are
no
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?