Charlotte Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999806789]. Mailed to: Charlotte Mountcastle. [15-2381]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2381 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2381 CHARLOTTE D. MOUNTCASTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PREMIER AUTO BROKERS INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK) Submitted: April 5, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlotte D. Mountcastle, Appellant Pro Se. David Denman Hopper, COOK, HEYWARD, LEE, HOPPER & FEEHAN, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2381 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court’s order dismissing her amended jurisdiction. We reversible error. complaint have reviewed for lack the of record subject and matter find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2015). dispense with contentions are no oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?