Bradley Meredith v. Kristina Deed
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00053-JPJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Meredith. [15-2395]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
KRISTINA DEEDS; MATTHEW MARDRES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
James P. Jones, District
March 31, 2016
April 6, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Meredith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), a district “court shall dismiss [a] case at
any time” if the action “fails to state a claim on which relief
may be granted.”
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
We review the
De’Lonta v. Angelone, 330 F.3d 630, 633 (4th Cir. 2003).
constitutional rights, he presumably was attempting to bring a
under color of state law are amenable to suit under § 1983.
West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
Here, Meredith has
failed to allege that the defendants (the mother of his child
and the mother’s current partner) were state actors or provide
any other legal basis for his suit.
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?