William Davis, Jr. v. Michael Grice

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--dismissing Motion for permission to appeal (FRAP 5) filed by Petitioner William Scott Davis, Jr. [999616204-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00059-AWA-DEM, 13-50689-FJS. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999650653]. Mailed to: Clara Swanson. [15-240]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-240 Doc: 4 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-240 In Re: MICHAEL DELL GRICE, Debtor. --------------------------------WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., Petitioner, v. MICHAEL DELL GRICE; CLARA P. SWANSON, Trustee, Respondents. On Petition for Permission to appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Frank J. Santoro, Bankruptcy Judge. (13-50689FJS) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Scott Davis, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Steve Clayton Taylor, LAW OFFICES OF STEVE C. TAYLOR, PC, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-240 Doc: 4 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William appeal the Scott Davis, bankruptcy Jr., court’s petitions order filed in a closed bankruptcy case. for returning permission a document See Fed. R. App. P. 5. to he This court may not exercise direct appellate jurisdiction over any bankruptcy court orders absent a certification issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2)(A) (2012). Because no such certification has issued in this matter, we dismiss the petition for appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?