William Davis, Jr. v. Michael Grice
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--dismissing Motion for permission to appeal (FRAP 5) filed by Petitioner William Scott Davis, Jr. [999616204-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00059-AWA-DEM, 13-50689-FJS. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999650653]. Mailed to: Clara Swanson. [15-240]
Appeal: 15-240
Doc: 4
Filed: 08/31/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-240
In Re:
MICHAEL DELL GRICE,
Debtor.
--------------------------------WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL DELL GRICE; CLARA P. SWANSON, Trustee,
Respondents.
On Petition for Permission to appeal from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News.
Frank J. Santoro, Bankruptcy Judge.
(13-50689FJS)
Submitted:
August 27, 2015
Decided:
August 31, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Steve Clayton
Taylor, LAW OFFICES OF STEVE C. TAYLOR, PC, Chesapeake,
Virginia, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-240
Doc: 4
Filed: 08/31/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William
appeal
the
Scott
Davis,
bankruptcy
Jr.,
court’s
petitions
order
filed in a closed bankruptcy case.
for
returning
permission
a
document
See Fed. R. App. P. 5.
to
he
This
court may not exercise direct appellate jurisdiction over any
bankruptcy court orders absent a certification issued pursuant
to
28
U.S.C.
§ 158(d)(2)(A)
(2012).
Because
no
such
certification has issued in this matter, we dismiss the petition
for appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?