Amina Al-Habashy v. VA Dept of Juvenile Justice


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999698035-2]. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00459-GEC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999802693]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-2401]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2401 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2401 AMINA AL-HABASHY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE; CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, Defendants – Appellees, And RODNEY HUBBARD; KIMBERLY DOYLE; JAMES O’HARE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:13-cv-00459-GEC) Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amina Al-Habashy, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Timothy Ross Spencer, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Appeal: 15-2401 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-2401 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/25/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Amina Al-Habashy appeals from the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her employment discrimination action. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Al-Habashy v. Virginia Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No. 7:13-cv-00459-GEC (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?