Amina Al-Habashy v. VA Dept of Juvenile Justice
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999698035-2]. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00459-GEC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999802693]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-2401]
<![CDATA[
Appeal: 15-2401
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/25/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2401
AMINA AL-HABASHY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE; CITY
OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,
Defendants – Appellees,
And
RODNEY HUBBARD; KIMBERLY DOYLE; JAMES O’HARE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00459-GEC)
Submitted:
April 21, 2016
Decided:
April 25, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amina Al-Habashy, Appellant Pro Se.
Gregory Clayton Fleming,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Timothy
Ross Spencer, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE,
Appeal: 15-2401
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/25/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2401
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/25/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Amina Al-Habashy appeals from the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on her employment discrimination action.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Al-Habashy v. Virginia Dep’t of
Juvenile Justice, No. 7:13-cv-00459-GEC (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2015).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
