Mary Slaey v. P. H. Harrington, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA,13-10541-RGM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [15-2404]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MARY D. SLAEY,
--------------------------------MARY D. SLAEY,
Debtor – Appellee,
P.H. HARRINGTON, JR.,
Creditor - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA)
October 31, 2016
December 7, 2016
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan J. Cilman, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Gregory Counts,
TYLER, BARTL, RAMSDELL & COUNTS, PLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
P.H. Harrington, Jr., appeals from the district court orders
determining that Harrington’s claim asserted in Mary D. Slaey’s
bankruptcy case was barred by the statute of limitations, and
denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record
and the arguments presented on appeal and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Harrington v. Slaey, No. 1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va.
Sept. 1, 2015 & filed Oct. 14, 2015; entered Oct. 15, 2015).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?