In re: Robert Saunders

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999719398-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999715580-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999702251-2] Originating case number: 5:10-cr-00018-FPS-JSK-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999763961]. Mailed to: Robert Saunders. [15-2457]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2457 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2457 In re: ROBERT LEE SAUNDERS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:10-cr-00018-FPS-JSK-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, February 29, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Saunders, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2457 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Saunders petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reduce his sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Saunders’ motion on November 23, 2015. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Saunders’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. pauperis. legal before We grant leave to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?