In re: Robert Saunders
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999719398-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999715580-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999702251-2] Originating case number: 5:10-cr-00018-FPS-JSK-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999763961]. Mailed to: Robert Saunders. [15-2457]
Appeal: 15-2457
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2457
In re: ROBERT LEE SAUNDERS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:10-cr-00018-FPS-JSK-1)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
February 29, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Saunders, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2457
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert
Lee
Saunders
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion to reduce his sentence.
He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied
Saunders’ motion on November 23, 2015.
Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Saunders’ case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot.
pauperis.
legal
before
We grant leave to proceed in forma
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?