Ajay Singh v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A205-072-514 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999875008].. [15-2464]

Appeal: 15-2464

Doc: 20

Filed: 06/30/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2464

AJAY KUMAR SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA
E.
LYNCH,
U.S.
Attorney;
CALVIN
Director, Immigration & Customs Enforcement,

MCCORMICK,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

May 20, 2016

Decided:

June 30, 2016

Before KING, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General,
Anthony W. Norwood, Christina P. Greer, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2464

Doc: 20

Filed: 06/30/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ajay Kumar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions
for

review

(Board)

of

an

order

dismissing

his

of

the

appeal

Board
from

of
the

Immigration

Appeals

Immigration

Judge’s

denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the
record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012),
and

that

substantial

evidence

supports

the

Board’s

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

decision,

Accordingly,

we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board.

See In re: Singh (B.I.A. Oct. 22, 2015).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2