US v. Eddie Wise

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999738920-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00844-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999813406].. [15-2477]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2477 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/05/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2477 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00844-FL) Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 5, 2016 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Wise; Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2477 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/05/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its foreclosure action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-cv- 00844-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2015; Oct. 9, 2015). pending motion as moot. We deny the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?