US v. Eddie Wise
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999738920-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00844-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999813406].. [15-2477]
Appeal: 15-2477
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/05/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2477
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00844-FL)
Submitted:
April 28, 2016
Decided:
May 5, 2016
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Wise; Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal Fowler,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2477
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/05/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the
district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government
in its foreclosure action.
We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
See United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-cv-
00844-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2015; Oct. 9, 2015).
pending motion as moot.
We deny the
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?