Doris Mercer v. American Airlines, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999730216-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00140-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999785633]. Mailed to: Appellants. [15-2490]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2490 Doc: 16 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2490 DORIS MERCER; STEPHEN MERCER, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant – Appellee, and AMR CORPORATION; ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00140-BO) Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Doris Mercer, Stephen Mercer, Appellants Pro Se. John Mitchell Armbruster, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 15-2490 Doc: 16 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-2490 Doc: 16 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Doris and Stephen Mercer appeal the district court’s order granting American Airlines’ motion for summary judgment. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, while we grant the Mercers’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 00140-BO (E.D.N.C. Mercer v. Am. Airlines, Inc., No. 5:14-cvOct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?