Doris Mercer v. American Airlines, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999730216-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00140-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999785633]. Mailed to: Appellants. [15-2490]
Appeal: 15-2490
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2490
DORIS MERCER; STEPHEN MERCER,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
AMR CORPORATION; ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00140-BO)
Submitted:
March 29, 2016
Decided:
March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doris Mercer, Stephen Mercer, Appellants Pro Se. John Mitchell
Armbruster,
SMITH,
ANDERSON,
BLOUNT,
DORSETT,
MITCHELL
&
JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Appeal: 15-2490
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2490
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/31/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Doris and Stephen Mercer appeal the district court’s order
granting American Airlines’ motion for summary judgment.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, while we grant the Mercers’ motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.
00140-BO
(E.D.N.C.
Mercer v. Am. Airlines, Inc., No. 5:14-cvOct.
26,
2015).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?