Meredith Cook v. Commissioner of Social Sec


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:14-cv-01294-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999981184].. [15-2494]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2494 Doc: 25 Filed: 12/06/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2494 MEREDITH COOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (6:14-cv-01294-JMC) Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: December 6, 2016 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida, for Appellant. Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Charles Kawas, Acting Supervisory Attorney, Jillian Quick, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Barbara Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2494 Doc: 25 Filed: 12/06/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Meredith Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s security denial income. We reversible error. of her have application reviewed the for record supplemental and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. Colvin, No. 6:14-cv-01294-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?