Meredith Cook v. Commissioner of Social Sec
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:14-cv-01294-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999981184].. [15-2494]
Appeal: 15-2494
Doc: 25
Filed: 12/06/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2494
MEREDITH COOK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (6:14-cv-01294-JMC)
Submitted:
October 25, 2016
Decided:
December 6, 2016
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida,
for Appellant.
Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel,
Charles Kawas, Acting Supervisory Attorney, Jillian Quick,
Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; William N. Nettles, United States
Attorney, Barbara Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2494
Doc: 25
Filed: 12/06/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Meredith Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the
Commissioner’s
security
denial
income.
We
reversible error.
of
her
have
application
reviewed
the
for
record
supplemental
and
find
no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Cook v. Colvin, No. 6:14-cv-01294-JMC
(D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?