In re: Norman Kerr
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999719604-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999710195-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00290-NCT-1,1:14-cv-01094-NCT-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999761895]. Mailed to: Kerr. [15-2497]
Appeal: 15-2497
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/25/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2497
In re: NORMAN ALAN KERR,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:09-cr-00290-NCT-1; 1:14-cv-01094-NCT-JEP)
Submitted:
February 23, 2016
Decided:
February 25, 2016
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Alan Kerr, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2497
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/25/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Norman Alan Kerr petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming
that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
present
court.
record
does
not
reveal
undue
delay
We find that the
in
the
district
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and deny the mandamus petition.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?