In re: Norman Kerr

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999719604-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999710195-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00290-NCT-1,1:14-cv-01094-NCT-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999761895]. Mailed to: Kerr. [15-2497]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2497 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2497 In re: NORMAN ALAN KERR, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:09-cr-00290-NCT-1; 1:14-cv-01094-NCT-JEP) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Alan Kerr, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2497 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Norman Alan Kerr petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. present court. record does not reveal undue delay We find that the in the district Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?