Jianguan Chen v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-170-236 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999906639].. [15-2501]
Appeal: 15-2501
Doc: 24
Filed: 08/09/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2501
JIANGUAN CHEN,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
July 13, 2016
Decided:
August 9, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C.
Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E.
Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ashley Martin, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2501
Doc: 24
Filed: 08/09/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jianguan Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic
of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
dismissing
his
appeal
from
the
immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding
of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript
of Chen’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence.
We conclude
that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any
of
the
administrative
factual
findings,
see
8
U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the
Board’s decision.
See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481
(1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board.
See In re Chen (B.I.A. Nov. 9, 2015).
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?