Nannette Buckner v. Jacob Lew

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00199-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. Mailed to: Nannette Buckner [999922252]. [15-2523]

Appeal: 15-2523

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/02/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2523

NANNETTE F. BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary, Department of the Treasury;
MARIAM G. GARVEY, Department of the Treasury; JACQUELINE ANN
BERRIEN; ROBERT L. HUNT, Area Director, South Atlantic Area,
Collections Operations,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00199-FL)

Submitted:

April 19, 2016

Decided:

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

September 2, 2016

Appeal: 15-2523

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/02/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Nannette F. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Gordon James,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-2523

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/02/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Nannette

F.

Buckner

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s
recommendation,

and

granting

Defendant’s

motion

for

summary

judgment in Buckner’s employment discrimination action.

Buckner

also appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for
reconsideration.

We

have

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Buckner v. Lew, No. 5:13-cv-00199-FL

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2015 & Nov. 2, 2015).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3