Theodore Gould v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00038-NKM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999988389]. [15-2527]
Appeal: 15-2527
Doc: 29
Filed: 12/16/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2527
DOUGLAS E. LITTLE, Personal Representative for the Estate of
Theodore B. Gould,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
John Koskinen; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00038-NKM)
Submitted:
October 28, 2016
Decided:
December 16, 2016
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul M. Donovan, LAROE, WINN, MOERMAN & DONOVAN, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellant.
Caroline D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, Bridget M. Rowan, Sherra Wong, Tax Division, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2527
Doc: 29
Filed: 12/16/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas E. Little, as personal representative for the Estate
of Theodore B. Gould, appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing Gould’s complaint on the basis of sovereign immunity
and res judicata.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Gould v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00038-
NKM (W.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?