Edmund Awah v. TransUnion

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02042-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999828574]. Mailed to: E. Awah. [15-2544]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2544 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2544 EDMUND AWAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRANSUNION; EQUIFAX; EXPERIAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02042-ELH) Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edmund K. Awah, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Daniel Adler, NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Sandy David Baron, SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, PA, Potomac, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2544 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Edmund Awah seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to remand his civil case back to state court after it was removed to federal court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). to appeal is interlocutory neither or a final collateral The order Awah seeks order order. See nor an appealable Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 74 (1996) (noting that an order denying a motion to remand, standing alone, is not final order). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?