Roosevelt Johnson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-04002-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999918768]. Mailed to: Roosevelt Johnson. [15-2546]

Appeal: 15-2546

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2546

ROOSEVELT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., A Virginia Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-04002-JFM)

Submitted:

August 25, 2016

Decided:

August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roosevelt Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Scott Kevin Sheets,
DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia; Robert Wai
Wong, Assistant General Counsel, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2546

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Roosevelt

Johnson

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his civil complaint in which he alleged that
the termination of his employment was the result of retaliation,
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C.
§ 1981

(2012).

reversible error.

We

2015).
legal
before

(D.

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
cv-04002-JFM

have

Md.

Johnson v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:14filed

Nov.

13,

2015;

entered

Nov.

16,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2