Deborah Cox v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999897126]. [15-2559]
Appeal: 15-2559
Doc: 31
Filed: 07/26/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2559
DEBORAH S. COX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK)
Submitted:
June 20, 2016
Decided:
July 26, 2016
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Geraldine Sumter, FERGUSON, CHAMBER & SUMTER, P.A., Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellant. James M. Powell, WOMBLE CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Blair L.
Byrum, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2559
Doc: 31
Filed: 07/26/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Deborah S. Cox appeals the district court’s order granting
Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC’s summary judgment motion on her age
discrimination
Discrimination
claims,
in
brought
Employment
pursuant
Act
of
to
1967,
as
the
Age
amended,
29
U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015); and North
Carolina’s
Equal
Employment
Practices
Act,
N.C.
Gen.
Stat.
§§ 143.422.1 to 143.422.3 (2015).
We have reviewed the record
and
Accordingly,
find
no
reversible
error.
district court’s judgment.
3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK
we
affirm
the
Cox v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC, No.
(W.D.N.C.
Nov.
17,
2015).
We
dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?