In re: Lamont Maurice El
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999732659-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999732658-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999725059-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999725050-2]; dismissing Motion for writ of habeas corpus (FRAP 21) filed by Petitioner Lamont Butler [999725048-2] Originating case number: Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999799083]. Mailed to: Maurice El. [15-2577]
Appeal: 15-2577
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2577
In Re: LAMONT MAURICE EL, a/k/a Lamont Butler,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Submitted:
April 7, 2016
Decided:
April 20, 2016
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamont Maurice El, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2577
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lamont Maurice El petitions for an original writ of habeas
corpus
challenging
his
confinement.
This
court
ordinarily
declines to entertain original habeas corpus petitions under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case provides no reason to depart
from the general rule.
Moreover, we find that a transfer to the
district court would not be in the interest of justice.
U.S.C. § 1631 (2012).
See 28
Accordingly, we deny Maurice El leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motions to amend the petition,
deny as moot his motion to correct the caption, and dismiss the
petition.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?