In Re: David Robinson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999791632-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999725788-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999725790-2] Originating case number: 1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999814562]. Mailed to: D. Robinson. [15-2587]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2587 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/06/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2587 In Re: DAVID MCDOWELL ROBINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1) Submitted: April 27, 2016 Decided: May 6, 2016 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David McDowell Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2587 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/06/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David McDowell Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his “Emergency Motion to Vacate” his prior convictions. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court has now ruled on Robinson’s motion. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny as moot the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?