In Re: David Robinson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999791632-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999725788-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999725790-2] Originating case number: 1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999814562]. Mailed to: D. Robinson. [15-2587]
Appeal: 15-2587
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/06/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2587
In Re:
DAVID MCDOWELL ROBINSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1)
Submitted:
April 27, 2016
Decided:
May 6, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David McDowell Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2587
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/06/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David McDowell Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his “Emergency
Motion
to
Vacate”
his
prior
convictions.
He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act.
The district court has now ruled on Robinson’s motion.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and
deny
as
moot
the
mandamus
petition.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?