US v. Brian D. Hill
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [999524726-2]; denying Motion to strike [999534705-2]; denying Motion to proceed pro se [999534707-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00435-WO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999560233]. Mailed to: Brian Hill. [15-4057]
Appeal: 15-4057
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/07/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
BRIAN DAVID HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cr-00435-WO-1)
Submitted:
March 30, 2015
Decided:
April 7, 2015
Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
Mark A. Jones, BELL, DAVIS & PITT, PA, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-4057
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/07/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Brian David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for an extension of time to appeal his conviction and
sentence.
Upon review, we conclude that the district court did
not abuse its discretion in denying Hill’s motion.
Accordingly,
we affirm this portion of the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
United States v. Hill, No. 1:13-cr-00435-
WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2015).
To
judgment
the
extent
entered
Hill
also
seeks
against
him,
the
to
appeal
Government
dismiss that portion of the appeal as untimely.
the
has
criminal
moved
to
In criminal
cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within 14
days after the entry of judgment or the order being appealed.
Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A).
Upon a showing of excusable neglect
or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of no
more than 30 additional days to file a notice of appeal.
Fed.
R. App. P. 4(b)(4), 26(b).
The
district
November 12, 2014.
court
entered
the
criminal
judgment
on
Hill filed a notice of appeal on January 29,
2015, well beyond the expiration of the appeal and excusable
neglect periods.
dismiss
this
We therefore grant the Government’s motion to
portion
of
the
appeal
2
as
untimely
because
Hill
Appeal: 15-4057
Doc: 18
Filed: 04/07/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension
of the appeal period. *
We deny Hill’s motions to strike and to proceed pro se and
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
DISMISSED IN PART
*
Even if we construe the January 12, 2015 motion for an
extension of time as a notice of appeal from the criminal
judgment, the appeal still is untimely as to the criminal
judgment.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?