US v. Jermaine Jenkins
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00487-NCT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [15-4095]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
JERMAINE LAMONT JENKINS, a/k/a Twin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cr-00487-NCT-1)
November 30, 2015
January 15, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George E. Crump, III, Rockingham, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Joanna G. McFadden,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Jermaine Lamont Jenkins pled guilty to conspiracy to commit
bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (2012), and aggravated identity
sentenced Jenkins to a total of 154 months’ imprisonment.
now appeals, raising three issues related to the calculation of
Jenkins contends that the district court clearly erred in
pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(a) (U.S.
Sentencing Comm’n 2013), and a two-level sentencing enhancement
district court’s factual findings at sentencing are reviewed for
United States v. Andrews, __ F.3d __, __, 2015 WL
(obstruction-of-justice enhancement); United States v. Steffen,
741 F.3d 411, 414 (4th Cir. 2013) (leadership enhancement).
review of the record reveals no clear error by the district
court in these determinations.
Accordingly, the enhancements
denying him a three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of
responsibility, pursuant to USSG § 3E1.1.
circumstances, a defendant is ineligible for the acceptance-of2
Pg: 3 of 3
States v. Knight, 606 F.3d 171, 175 (4th Cir. 2010).
See United States v. Hudson, 272 F.3d 260, 263-64
conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying
See United States v. Burns, 781 F.3d 688, 692
(4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 135 S.
Ct. 2872 (2015).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?