US v. Joey Justu
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cr-00079-JAB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999828646].. [15-4643]
Appeal: 15-4643
Doc: 22
Filed: 05/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4643
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOEY DWAYNE JUSTUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00079-JAB-1)
Submitted:
May 18, 2016
Decided:
May 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Tiffany T. Jefferson,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellant.
Terry Michael Meinecke, Assistant United States
Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-4643
Doc: 22
Filed: 05/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Joey Dwayne Justus pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea
agreement, to possession of firearms by a convicted felon, in
violation
of
18
U.S.C.
§§ 922(g)(1),
924(a)(2)
(2012).
The
district court sentenced Justus to 57 months’ imprisonment, the
bottom of the 57- to 71-month advisory Sentencing Guidelines
range.
On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no
meritorious grounds for appeal, but questioning whether Justus
had
a
qualifying
§ 922(g)(1). *
supplemental
prior
felony
conviction
for
purposes
of
Justus was advised of his right to file a pro se
brief,
but
has
not
filed
one.
The
Government
declined to file a brief.
A
defendant
is
guilty
of
violating
§
922(g)(1)
if
he
possesses a firearm or ammunition after having “been convicted
in any court of[] a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding one year.”
conviction
for
Justus has a prior North Carolina felony
attempted
breaking
received a 4- to 14-month sentence.
or
entering
for
which
he
Counsel for Justus argues
that, because the North Carolina Justice Reinvestment Act of
2011 required that nine months of that sentence be served on
*
Justus preserved this issue for appeal in his conditional
guilty plea.
2
Appeal: 15-4643
Doc: 22
Filed: 05/20/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
postrelease supervision, the state conviction was not punishable
by a term exceeding a year in prison.
As counsel for Justus
concedes, this argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in
United States v. Barlow, 811 F.3d 133, 140 (4th Cir. 2015),
petition for cert. filed, No. 15-8925 (U.S. Apr. 8, 2016).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record in this
case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal.
This
court requires that counsel inform Justus, in writing, of the
right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for
further review.
If Justus requests that a petition be filed,
but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous,
then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from
representation.
Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof
was served on Justus.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?