US v. William Scott Davis, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999762606-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999762601-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999714211-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999729208-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cr-00240-BR-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764023]. Mailed to: Davis. [15-4702]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-4702 Doc: 23 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-4702 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:14-cr-00240-BR-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, February 29, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-4702 Doc: 23 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying 33 motions in his pending criminal matter. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), collateral orders, 28 and U.S.C. certain § 1292 interlocutory (2012); Fed. R. Civ. and P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). order The order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Davis’ motions to appoint counsel and for emergency eye jurisdiction. surgery and dismiss the appeal for lack of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?