US v. Christopher Beebe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cr-00194-CMC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000018468].. [15-4770]
Appeal: 15-4770
Doc: 31
Filed: 02/07/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4770
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER BRIT BEEBE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:15-cr-00194-CMC-1)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 7, 2017
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicole Nicolette Mace, THE MACE FIRM, Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina, for Appellant.
William N. Nettles, United States
Attorney, Robert F. Daley, Jr., William E. Day, II, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-4770
Doc: 31
Filed: 02/07/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Brit Beebe seeks to appeal his conviction and
97-month
sentence
for
conspiracy
to
distribute
controlled
substances, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(E) (2012), and
possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking
crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) (2012).
In its brief, the
Government argues that the appeal should be dismissed as barred
by Beebe’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea
agreement.
Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript
of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Beebe
knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that
the issues Beebe seeks to raise on appeal fall squarely within
the
compass
Beebe’s
of
his
assertion
agreement.
waiver
that
of
the
appellate
Government
rights.
We
breached
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
reject
the
plea
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?