US v. Malcolm Tyler

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cr-00009-FPS-JSK-2,5:14-cv-00115-FPS-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999609167]. Mailed to: Malcolm Demon Tyler FCI MCKEAN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 8000 Bradford, PA 16701-0980. [15-6048]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6048 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/25/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6048 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MALCOLM DEMON TYLER, a/k/a Milt, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John S. Kaull, Magistrate Judge. (5:13-cr-00009-FPS-JSK-2; 5:14-cv-00115-FPSJSK) Submitted: June 17, 2015 Decided: June 25, 2015 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Demon Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. Tara Noel Tighe, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6048 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/25/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Malcolm Demon Tyler seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 54(b); Cohen v. 545-46 (1949). 28 U.S.C. Beneficial § 1292 Indus. (2012); Loan Fed. Corp., 337 R. Civ. U.S. P. 541, The order Tyler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?