James Hayes v. Tracy Phillip

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999517249-2] Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03208-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999587627]. Mailed to: James Aaron Hayes NASH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 600 Nashville, NC 27856-0000. [15-6078]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6078 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6078 JAMES AARON HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRACY PHILLIPS; GLORIA THORNBURG; WILLARD R. HALL, Defendants – Appellees, and AGUSTAS HILYARD; THOMAS ASBELL; ROBERT C. LEWIS; MICHAEL A. HARDEE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03208-D) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Aaron Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Jodi Harrison, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6078 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 Hayes the PER CURIAM: James Aaron appeals district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Phillips, No. 5:12-ct-03208-D (E.D.N.C. June 10, 2013 & Dec. 15, 2014). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?