US v. Eleazar Guerrero
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cr-00208-FL-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999589447]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-6111]
Appeal: 15-6111
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/26/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6111
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ELEAZAR CORTES GUERRERO, a/k/a Cat,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-cr-00208-FL-1)
Submitted:
May 21, 2015
Decided:
May 26, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eleazar Cortes Guerrero, Appellant Pro Se.
Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, William Glenn Perry,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6111
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/26/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Eleazar Cortes Guerrero appeals the district court’s order
denying
his
motion
for
a
sentence
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
reduction
pursuant
to
We review the district court’s
decision for an abuse of discretion.
F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Munn, 595
We do not find any abuse of
discretion as the record justifies the district court’s decision
not to reduce Guerrero’s sentence, as it properly considered
Guerrero’s post-sentencing conduct pursuant to U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual § 1B.10, cmt. n. 1(B)(iii) (2014).
Accordingly,
dispense
with
contentions
are
we
oral
affirm
the
argument
adequately
district
because
presented
in
court’s
the
the
facts
order.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?