US v. Eleazar Guerrero

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cr-00208-FL-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999589447]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-6111]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6111 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/26/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6111 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ELEAZAR CORTES GUERRERO, a/k/a Cat, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00208-FL-1) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eleazar Cortes Guerrero, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, William Glenn Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6111 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/26/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Eleazar Cortes Guerrero appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). reduction pursuant to We review the district court’s decision for an abuse of discretion. F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010). United States v. Munn, 595 We do not find any abuse of discretion as the record justifies the district court’s decision not to reduce Guerrero’s sentence, as it properly considered Guerrero’s post-sentencing conduct pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B.10, cmt. n. 1(B)(iii) (2014). Accordingly, dispense with contentions are we oral affirm the argument adequately district because presented in court’s the the facts order. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?