Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999534618-2] Originating case number: 6:13-cv-02940-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999589700]. Mailed to: T. Fair. [15-6128]

Appeal: 15-6128

Doc: 14

Filed: 05/26/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6128

THOMAS M. FAIR, JR., a/k/a Thomas Marvin Fair,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRIAN P. STIRLING,
RANDOLPH,

Director;

DR.

JOHN

B.

TOMARCHIO;

DR.

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (6:13-cv-02940-RMG)

Submitted:

May 21, 2015

Decided:

May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Samuel F. Arthur,
III, Jay Ritchie Lee, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6128

Doc: 14

Filed: 05/26/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Thomas
orders:
judge

Marvin

(1)
and

Fair,

accepting

denying

Jr.,
the

relief

appeals

the

recommendation

on

his

42

district
of

U.S.C.

the

court’s

magistrate

§ 1983

(2012),

complaint, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Fair v. Stirling, No. 6:13-cv-02940-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 10,

2014; filed Jan. 20, 2015 & entered Jan. 21, 2015).

We deny

Fair’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2