William Kinjo Smith v. Stephanie Hollenback

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999540056-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02117-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999632666]. Mailed to: William Kinjo Smith. [15-6143]

Appeal: 15-6143

Doc: 13

Filed: 08/03/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6143

WILLIAM KINJO SMITH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STEPHANIE HOLLENBACK, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02117-FL)

Submitted:

July 29, 2015

Decided:

August 3, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Kinjo Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6143

Doc: 13

Filed: 08/03/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William
district

Kinjo

court’s

Smith,

order

a

federal

dismissing

U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.
find no reversible error.

prisoner,

without

appeals

prejudice

his

the
28

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, although we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.

Smith v. Hollenback, No. 5:14-hc-02117-

FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2