Marcus Allison v. Tom Martin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999523810-2]; terminating Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999523808-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00668-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999590477]. Mailed to: Marcus Allen. [15-6155]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6155 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/27/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6155 MARCUS DANIEL ALLISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOM MARTIN, County of Oconee SC by Atty; DEPUTY SOL DAVID WAGNER, Oconee Co; CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER WILSON BURR, Oconee Co; CORPORAL JARRETT PRICE, O.C.S.O.; SERGEANT CASEY BOWLING, O.C.S.O.; JAMES SINGLETON, Retired Sheriff, O.C.S.O.; ELIZABETH HOLCOMB, M.D. Lieber Correctional Institution; jointly, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN DOE, a/k/a Sheriff, O.C.S.O.; RON DOE, jointly; DON DOE, jointly, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00668-RBH) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. May 27, 2015 Appeal: 15-6155 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/27/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Marcus Daniel Allison, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6155 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/27/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Marcus Daniel Allison appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Allison’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. Allison also appeals the district court’s subsequent text order denying reconsideration. We have reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (D.S.C. Nov. 24, reviewed the record and find no Allison v. Martin, No. 1:14-cv-00668-RBH 2014; Dec. 19, 2014). We further deny Allison’s motion to appoint counsel and deny as unnecessary his motion for a certificate of appealability. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?