Robin Collins v. Pat Green

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03111-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999606427]. Mailed to: Robin Collins. [15-6172]

Appeal: 15-6172

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6172

ROBIN VIRGINIA MEADOWS COLLINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAT GREEN; ELLIOTT PANNELL; H. M. EDWARDS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03111-D)

Submitted:

June 18, 2015

Decided:

June 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robin Virginia Meadows Collins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6172

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robin Virginia Meadows Collins seeks to appeal the district
court’s

order

dismissing

without

prejudice

her

civil

rights

action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state
a claim on which relief may be granted.

This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders.

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan

Corp.,

337

U.S.

541,

545-47

(1949).

Because

the

deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by
the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order
Collins

seeks

appealable

to

appeal

interlocutory

is
or

neither
collateral

a

final
order.

order

nor

Domino

an

Sugar

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67
(4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly,
jurisdiction.

we

dismiss

the

appeal

for

lack

of

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2