Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00263-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999588769]. Mailed to: Jeffrey Cohen. [15-6193]

Appeal: 15-6193

Doc: 12

Filed: 05/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6193

JEFFREY COHEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROD ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney; HARRY GRUBER,
Attorney; JOYCE MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney,

Asst.

US

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00263-WDQ)

Submitted:

May 19, 2015

Decided: May 22, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Brian Cohen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6193

Doc: 12

Filed: 05/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey

Brian

Cohen

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing without prejudice 1 his civil complaint against federal
prosecutors as premature 2 under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915, 1915A (2012).
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Cohen v. Rosenstein, No. 1:15-cv-00263-WDQ (D. Md. Feb.

3, 2015).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

1

We have jurisdiction because Cohen cannot cure the defect
identified in his complaint by mere amendment. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67
(4th Cir. 1993).
2

See Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 646 (1997); Heck v.
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994).

2