Deborah Hubbard v. William Byars, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-00033-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999611712]. Mailed to: Deborah Hubbard. [15-6207]

Appeal: 15-6207

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/30/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6207

DEBORAH V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a
Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BYARS, JR.; JUDY ANDERSON; T. TYLER; D. FOULK, a/k/a
Officer Foulks; SADI RAFI,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-00033-BHH)

Submitted:

June 25, 2015

Decided:

June 30, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborah V. Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se.
South Carolina, for Appellees.

James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6207

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/30/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Deborah

V.

Hubbard

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

Hubbard v. Byars,

No. 8:14-cv-00033-BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2015). We dispense with
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2