US v. Kelvin Holman
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:04-cr-00964-MBS-2,5:12-cv-02744-MBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Kelvin Holman. [15-6212]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
KELVIN JEROD HOLMAN, a/k/a J-Five,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00964-MBS-2; 5:12-cv-02744-MBS)
June 18, 2015
June 22, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin Jerod Holman, Appellant Pro Se.
Stacey Denise Haynes,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Kelvin Jerod Holman seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
When the district court denies
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack, 529 U.S.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Holman has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny
Pg: 3 of 3
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?