Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999552365-2] Originating case number: 6:14-cv-04882-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626112]. Mailed to: Fair. [15-6262]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6262 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6262 THOMAS M. FAIR, JR., also known as Thomas Marvin Fair, also known as Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; MICHAEL MCCALL, Division Director of Operations at the South Carolina Department of Corrections; DENNIS BUSH; JAMES SLIGH; PREA COMMITTEE MEMBERS; R. HILTON; WILLIE DAVIS; THOMAS COMMANDER; STEVEN NOLAN, individually and in his/her official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:14-cv-04882-RMG) Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6262 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fair v. Stirling, No. 6:14-cv-04882-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2015). We deny Fair’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?