Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999552365-2] Originating case number: 6:14-cv-04882-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626112]. Mailed to: Fair. [15-6262]
Appeal: 15-6262
Doc: 15
Filed: 07/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6262
THOMAS M. FAIR, JR., also known as Thomas Marvin Fair, also
known as Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department
of Corrections; MICHAEL MCCALL, Division Director of
Operations at the South Carolina Department of Corrections;
DENNIS BUSH; JAMES SLIGH; PREA COMMITTEE MEMBERS; R. HILTON;
WILLIE DAVIS; THOMAS COMMANDER; STEVEN NOLAN, individually and
in his/her official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (6:14-cv-04882-RMG)
Submitted:
July 21, 2015
Decided:
July 23, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6262
Doc: 15
Filed: 07/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Fair v. Stirling,
No. 6:14-cv-04882-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2015). We deny Fair’s motion
for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?