Damon Jackson v. Dennis Bush

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999550231-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03380-MGL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999657455]. Mailed to: Damon Jackson. [15-6279]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6279 Doc: 22 Filed: 09/10/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6279 DAMON LEMONT JACKSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DENNIS BUSH, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03380-MGL) Submitted: July 31, 2015 Decided: September 10, 2015 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damon Lemont Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6279 Doc: 22 Filed: 09/10/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 PER CURIAM: Damon Lemont Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. not appealable unless a circuit certificate of appealability. certificate of justice or The order is judge issues 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). appealability will not issue absent a A “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). on the merits, demonstrating district that court’s debatable or a When the district court denies relief prisoner reasonable assessment wrong. satisfies Slack jurists this would of the v. McDaniel, standard find constitutional 529 U.S. by that the claims is 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jackson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. facts and legal We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are 2 adequately presented in the Appeal: 15-6279 Doc: 22 materials before Filed: 09/10/2015 this court Pg: 3 of 3 and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?