Damon Jackson v. Dennis Bush
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999550231-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03380-MGL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999657455]. Mailed to: Damon Jackson. [15-6279]
Appeal: 15-6279
Doc: 22
Filed: 09/10/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6279
DAMON LEMONT JACKSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DENNIS BUSH, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03380-MGL)
Submitted:
July 31, 2015
Decided:
September 10, 2015
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damon Lemont Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka,
Senior
Assistant
Attorney
General,
James
Anthony
Mabry,
Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6279
Doc: 22
Filed: 09/10/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Damon Lemont Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition.
not
appealable
unless
a
circuit
certificate of appealability.
certificate
of
justice
or
The order is
judge
issues
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A).
appealability
will
not
issue
absent
a
A
“a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
on
the
merits,
demonstrating
district
that
court’s
debatable
or
a
When the district court denies relief
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
satisfies
Slack
jurists
this
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
standard
find
constitutional
529
U.S.
by
that
the
claims
is
473,
484
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack, 529 U.S.
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Jackson has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we
deny Jackson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal.
facts
and
legal
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
2
adequately
presented
in
the
Appeal: 15-6279
Doc: 22
materials
before
Filed: 09/10/2015
this
court
Pg: 3 of 3
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?