Anirudh Sukhu v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999544921-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ,1:08-cr-00557-WD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999608321]. Mailed to: Anirudh Sukhu. [15-6282]
Appeal: 15-6282
Doc: 12
Filed: 06/24/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6282
ANIRUDH LAKHAN SUKHU,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD)
Submitted:
June 17, 2015
Decided:
June 24, 2015
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anirudh Lakhan Sukhu, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6282
Doc: 12
Filed: 06/24/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anirudh
dismissing
Lakhan
his
petition
jurisdiction.
We
reversible error.
by
the
Sukhu
district
appeals
for
have
a
the
writ
reviewed
of
the
district
mandamus
record
court’s
for
and
order
lack
find
of
no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.
Sukhu
v.
United
States,
1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2015).
Nos.
We
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?