Anirudh Sukhu v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999544921-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ,1:08-cr-00557-WD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999608321]. Mailed to: Anirudh Sukhu. [15-6282]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6282 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6282 ANIRUDH LAKHAN SUKHU, Petitioner – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD) Submitted: June 17, 2015 Decided: June 24, 2015 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anirudh Lakhan Sukhu, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6282 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anirudh dismissing Lakhan his petition jurisdiction. We reversible error. by the Sukhu district appeals for have a the writ reviewed of the district mandamus record court’s for and order lack find of no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. Sukhu v. United States, 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2015). Nos. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?