Ricky Gamble v. George Kenworthy
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03053-F. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999590510]. Mailed to: Ricky Leander Gamble. [15-6284]
Appeal: 15-6284
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/27/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6284
RICKY LEANDER GAMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE KENWORTHY; OLIVER S. MUHAMMAD; KHALIL AKBAR; CHAPLAIN
HOVIS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CHAPLAIN GIDDIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03053-F)
Submitted:
May 21, 2015
Decided:
May 27, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Leander Gamble,
Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly D. Grande,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6284
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/27/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky
granting
Leander
Gamble
Defendants’
appeals
summary
the
district
judgment
motion
court’s
on
his
order
claims
alleging Defendants violated his First Amendment rights, as well
as his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized
Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We have
Accordingly,
Gamble v. Kenworthy,
No. 5:12-ct-03053-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2015).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?