US v. Asmar Newsome

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cr-00053-RGD-FBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999590575]. Mailed to: Asmar Newsome. [15-6286]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6286 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/27/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6286 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ASMAR NAFIS NEWSOME, a/k/a Shorty, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:10-cr-00053-RGD-FBS-1) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Asmar Nafis Newsome, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Cross, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6286 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/27/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Asmar Nafis Newsome appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) reconsideration. reversible (2012) We error. have See and reviewed U.S § 1B1.10(b)(2), p.s. dispense oral argument the his record Sentencing (2014). with denying Accordingly, because the motion and find Guidelines we no Manual affirm. facts for and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?