US v. Asmar Newsome
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cr-00053-RGD-FBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999590575]. Mailed to: Asmar Newsome. [15-6286]
Appeal: 15-6286
Doc: 8
Filed: 05/27/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6286
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ASMAR NAFIS NEWSOME, a/k/a Shorty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:10-cr-00053-RGD-FBS-1)
Submitted:
May 21, 2015
Decided:
May 27, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Asmar Nafis Newsome, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Elizabeth Cross,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6286
Doc: 8
Filed: 05/27/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Asmar
Nafis
Newsome
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18
U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)
reconsideration.
reversible
(2012)
We
error.
have
See
and
reviewed
U.S
§ 1B1.10(b)(2),
p.s.
dispense
oral
argument
the
his
record
Sentencing
(2014).
with
denying
Accordingly,
because
the
motion
and
find
Guidelines
we
no
Manual
affirm.
facts
for
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?