US v. Lloyd Anthonie William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:98-cr-00144-MR-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999572957]. Mailed to: Williams. [15-6291]

Appeal: 15-6291

Doc: 5

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LLOYD ANTHONIE WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Shelby.
Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (4:98-cr-00144-MR-1)

Submitted:

April 23, 2015

Decided:

April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Anthonie Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Corey F. Ellis,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6291

Doc: 5

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying

his

motion

to

denying

his

reconsider

“Petition

for

the

court’s

Resentencing,”

in

earlier
which

sought relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

order

Williams
We have

A district

court lacks authority to grant a motion to reconsider its ruling
on a § 3582(c)(2) motion.

United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d

233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying
Williams’ motion.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2