US v. Manuel Zuniga

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cr-00194-RBS-DEM-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999637865]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-6385]

Appeal: 15-6385

Doc: 9

Filed: 08/11/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6385

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MANUEL ZUNIGA,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:10-cr-00194-RBS-DEM-1)

Submitted:

July 30, 2015

Decided:

August 11, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel Zuniga, Appellant
Assistant
United
States
Appellee.

Pro Se.
Attorney,

Kevin Michael Comstock,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6385

Doc: 9

Filed: 08/11/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Manuel Zuniga appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce
sentence filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Zuniga, No. 2:10-cr-00194-RBS-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 23,
2015); see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.
2010).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2