Christopher Richards v. William Muse


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999639008]. Mailed to: Christopher Richards. [15-6404]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6404 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/12/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6404 CHRISTOPHER RICHARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM MUSE, Chairman; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA) Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: August 12, 2015 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Richards, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-6404 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/12/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher granting Richards Defendants summary § 1983 (2012) action. reversible claims error. with appeals judgment district in court’s Richards’ 42 order U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Specifically, respect the to the we observe application of that Richards’ Virginia’s three- strikes provision are time-barred, and that he has failed to sufficiently allege any related equal protection claims in his complaint. judgment. Accordingly, and materials affirm the district court’s See Richards v. Muse, No. 1:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2015). facts we legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?