Christopher Richards v. William Muse
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999639008]. Mailed to: Christopher Richards. [15-6404]
Appeal: 15-6404
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/12/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6404
CHRISTOPHER RICHARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM MUSE, Chairman; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA)
Submitted:
July 28, 2015
Decided:
August 12, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Richards, Appellant Pro Se.
James Milburn Isaacs,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-6404
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/12/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher
granting
Richards
Defendants
summary
§ 1983 (2012) action.
reversible
claims
error.
with
appeals
judgment
district
in
court’s
Richards’
42
order
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Specifically,
respect
the
to
the
we
observe
application
of
that
Richards’
Virginia’s
three-
strikes provision are time-barred, and that he has failed to
sufficiently allege any related equal protection claims in his
complaint.
judgment.
Accordingly,
and
materials
affirm
the
district
court’s
See Richards v. Muse, No. 1:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA (E.D.
Va. Feb. 26, 2015).
facts
we
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?